On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> This looks suspicious. Haven't you meant "dep_tristate"? Especially as
> indydog.c doesn't seem to make any effort to validate it's running on the
> system it thinks it is before poking random memory locations. It won't
> probably even compile for a non-MIPS kernel.
> BTW, why do people insist on sending patches as attachments -- it makes
> commenting them helly twisted, sigh...
How true. MIME - broken solution for a broken design ;) More serious,
MIME makes sense when using a MUA that garbles patches like Netscape or
certain versions of Pine.
Ralf (Prolly still be using Mutt + vi in 5 years ...)