[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] linux 2.4.17: The second mb() rework (final)

To: "Kevin D. Kissell" <>
Subject: Re: [patch] linux 2.4.17: The second mb() rework (final)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:11:15 +0100 (MET)
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <>,,,,
In-reply-to: <006e01c1b606$27b1b060$0deca8c0@Ulysses>
Organization: Technical University of Gdansk
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:

> So I think that the Linux code was perfectly correct in considering
> the TX39 to be without SYNC, just as a Vr4101 must be
> consdered to be without LL/SC.  They decode the instructions,
> but they don't actually implement them as specified.

 The code is not correct if "bc0f" is needed to be sure a write-back
happened.  If that is the case, the processors need their own wbflush() 
implementation like R2k/R3k configurations in older DECstations. 

+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+        e-mail:, PGP key available        +

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>