On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:07:51 -0800
> From: Ralf Baechle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: Jason Gunthorpe <email@example.com>
> Cc: Matthew Dharm <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
> Subject: Re: MIPS64 status?
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > I have such hardware myself. IMHO the best option is the mips64 kernel and
> > I hope to try it someday. But in practice I'd guess that Ralf's highmem
> > patch is more likely to be usuable first (?).
> Depends if you can live with the problems of the current mips64 kernel.
> If you can then it's highmem-free memory managment is certainly the way
> to go. It's also not limited to peanuts numbers of gigabytes but can
> support as much memory as your can tack on a MIPS.
Who, if anyone, has a MIPS64 reference design board available ?
...With >4G memory capacity ?