On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:28:16PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:28:16 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com>
> To: Ralf Baechle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <email@example.com>,
> Kip Walker <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
> Subject: Re: .section problems in entry.S
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:45:42PM -0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:03:41PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > > Certainly not. The problem is known and so far I've just hacked around
> > > > it more or less elegant. But it's a trap and so I think we've got good
> > > > reasons to force people to upgrade to a newer assembler than the current
> > > > minimal version. The question is which - I don't like frequent tool
> > > > upgrades.
> > >
> > > There are no working released binutils for a modern MIPS/Linux system,
> > > AFAIK. However, version 2.11.92 from the CVS seems to work reasonably
> > > well now, so chances are the next release will do as well. Maybe 2.12
> > > will be a good candidate then, once it is released and tested a bit.
> > What is the schedule for 2.12?
> There isn't one yet; I'm hoping within three months. I'm going to try
> to roll the ball a little this week.
Longer than I'd like to see. Anybody got a sufficiently hacked version
of ~ 2.11?