[Top] [All Lists]

Re: flush_cache_range

To: Tom Appermont <>
Subject: Re: flush_cache_range
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:47:53 +0200
In-reply-to: <>; from on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:32:58AM +0200
References: <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:32:58AM +0200, Tom Appermont wrote:

> Can someone explain me why start and end parameters are ignored in
> r4k_flush_cache_range_d32i32() and cache range flushing operations
> for other platforms?

Afair the reason was that most invokations cover a range that is larger than
the entire cache anyway so our implementation in practice doesn't cause
any harm.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>