I think there is a bug in the _save_fp_context function in
The problem is the following piece of code:
First of all what should the ".set nomacro" do?
If it means that the EX macro shouldn't be used then this entry wouldn't
get into __ex_table, which would be wrong.
But it look like it uses the macro anyway, regardless of the ".set
nomacro", at least with the compiler I use.
Never the less we do not handle entries in the __ex_table which is
located in a branch delay.
So we need to handle the situation where we take a page fault on an
instruction which is located in a brach delay slot, or we don't put the
"potential" faulting instruction in a delay slot.
Any ideas, how we should handle this in a nice and clean way?
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556