[Top] [All Lists]

Re: irq.c

To: Pete Popov <>
Subject: Re: irq.c
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:18:25 -0800
Cc:, "" <>
In-reply-to: <>; from on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:07:58AM -0800
References: <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:07:58AM -0800, Pete Popov wrote:

> Thanks for pointing that out.  If all architectures will move to
> kernel/irq.c, then it probably makes sense to wait.  At first glance,
> mips/kernel/irq.c seems pretty close to i386/kernel/irq.c -- certainly a
> lot closer than many of the other copies.  

It was derived from a fairly recent copy of the x86 irq.c; running out of
time I never completed the rewrite.  The idea is to implement some kind
of modular interrupt mechanism which allows us to have a single piece of
code in the MIPS kernel that knows how to handle i8259 interrupt, a single
piece of code to handle GT64120 interrupts etc.  Not like the current mess
which duplicates code ad infinitum.

Aside it's also going to make the RTLinux fraction happy.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>