[Top] [All Lists]

Re: base.tgz

Subject: Re: base.tgz
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:16:03 +0200
In-reply-to: <>; from on Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 04:14:50AM +0200
References: <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 04:14:50AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:33:47AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:

> * Package: base-files

base-files_2.2.2_mipsel.deb provides /etc/nsswitch.conf as well
as glibc_2.0.6ml5.rpm does. Which one do you prefer to have in
a base.tgz?

--------- .rpm version, comments/blank lines removed
passwd:     files nisplus nis
shadow:     files nisplus nis
group:      files nisplus nis
hosts:      files nisplus nis dns
services:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
networks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
protocols:  nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
rpc:        nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
ethers:     nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
netmasks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files     
bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
netgroup:   nisplus
publickey:  nisplus
automount:  files nisplus
aliases:    files nisplus

--------- .deb version, comments/blank lines removed
passwd:         compat
group:          compat
shadow:         compat
hosts:          files dns
networks:       files
protocols:      db files
services:       db files
ethers:         db files
rpc:            db files
netgroup:       nis

Personally, I prefer to have the .deb version, but I think it's
better to ask before;) Esp the nisplus entries in RH's variant
make me to dislike is...


Fehler eingestehen, Größe zeigen: Nehmt die Rechtschreibreform zurück!!!
/* Jan-Benedict Glaw <> -- +49-177-5601720 */
keyID=0x8399E1BB fingerprint=250D 3BCF 7127 0D8C A444 A961 1DBD 5E75 8399 E1BB
     "insmod vi.o and there we go..." (Alexander Viro on linux-kernel)

Attachment: pgpKeeq1SIAfs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>