[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sys_chown vs. sys_lchown

To: Wichert Akkerman <>
Subject: Re: sys_chown vs. sys_lchown
From: Florian Lohoff <>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:42:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <>; from Wichert Akkerman on Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 06:12:25PM +0200
Organization: rfc822 - pure communication
References: <> <>
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 06:12:25PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > I discovered a anomaly there when trying to compile current strace
> > which has sys_lchown which is sys_chown in current glibc and fails
> > to compile thereof.
> strace got that from include/asm-mips/unistd.h from a 2.3.99pre5 kernel
> tree, which should be authoritive. Are you sure that your glibc is
> compiled correctly?

;) As this is made by Ralf Baechle the "Master himself" ill trust that :)

Florian Lohoff                  +49-subject-2-change
"Technology is a constant battle between manufacturers producing bigger and
more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>