At 12:46 AM 5/28/99 +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>The R5000 is supported and known to work. You happen to have a
>second level cache on that board?
how convinced are people that the VR5000 is supported? I'm running
the latest code off the linux.sgi.com cvs server and I'm getting *very*
weird page faulting problems when doing the kernel/user space
hazard shuffle. Its really hard to describe the problems as they are
not deterministic: sometimes the right thing happens, other times
I get restricted instruction exceptions... Both of these can happen on
the very same kernel binary...
Which of the vec0 routines should be used on the VR5K?