[Top] [All Lists]


To: dmanddmer <>
Subject: Re:
From: (David Watters)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:30:47 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: dmanddmer <> "Re:" (Jan 19, 5:21am)
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
On Jan 19,  5:21am, dmanddmer wrote:
> Subject: Re:
> Personally, since SGI made the questionable decision to port to NT, I
> wish they would commit to AMD's processors instead of Intels.

SGI couldn't.  SGI had to replace so much of the IA/440xx chipset that there
had to be a prettty big agreement with Intel covering a lot of issues,
machines, processors, and markets to allow SGI to, for example, implement
the frontside bus in their own chipset.  Don't forget all those Co'op
marketing dollars too. -dong ^dong -dong ^^dong

> Porting to NT alone is probably not enough to save the company.  It
> didn't work for Intergraph.

Yeah, but Intergraph is lame so they had that working against them too. :)

David Watters         |                 Silicon*Graphics 
Systems Engineer      |       
Silicon Graphics, Inc.|  (6/13/97) |  1.800.800.SGI1 (Sales) 1.800.800.4SGI (Support) 
DID 1.614.844.3820    | (N64, the $130 SGI!) 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>