[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GNU/Hurd

To: (Torbjörn Gannholm)
Subject: Re: GNU/Hurd
From: (Alan Cox)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 21:28:47 +0000 (GMT)
In-reply-to: <> from "Torbjörn Gannholm" at Nov 27, 98 09:21:19 am
> But still, why wouldn't some implementation of HURD (or mach) be able to be
> preemptible?

I believe its been done for MACH so that MACH tasks are hard real time. FOr
hard real time on Linux Rtlinux sits under the kernel and runs as a very
compact realtime microkernel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: GNU/Hurd, Alan Cox <=