On Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 08:51:47PM +0200, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> I think you forgot a break in the middle of a switch statement, setting
> order to 3 is pretty nonsense otherwise.
> I compiled a new kernel with my patch, and I couldn't see any changes. The
> VCED is probably handled correctly by the interrupt anyway.
Thanks, applied. Note that this bug just resulted in somewhat reduced
performance at cost of 28kb more memory used. On SC CPUs we use 8
different empty_zero_page pages to avoid VCED errors completly.