[Top] [All Lists]

Re: utmp.h

Subject: Re: utmp.h
From: "Francis M. J. Hsieh" <>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:18:58 +0800
In-reply-to: <>; from on Sun, Jul 19, 1998 at 03:20:50PM +0200
References: <> <>
On Sun, Jul 19, 1998 at 03:20:50PM +0200, wrote:
> It's that way because changing the structure to what the other architectures
> are using would break the binary compatibility for not that much benefit.
> I did so because glibc has already been the only libc for MIPS when other
> architectures were still relying only on H.J. Lu's Linux Libc aka libc 5.
> It's on the to do list for libc 7 and I think we've got still quite some
> time before we take that step.

hmmm... Okay, maybe i should change the source (seems to be a hard work)
to fit my need.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • utmp.h, Francis M.J. Hsieh
    • Re: utmp.h, ralf
      • Re: utmp.h, Francis M. J. Hsieh <=