[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Libc in CVS

Subject: Re: Libc in CVS
From: (Alan Cox)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 14:09:12 +0000 (GMT)
In-reply-to: <> from "" at Nov 24, 97 02:18:04 pm
> For rpm the trick is easy, just don't use a static linked binary.
> Unfortunately the Redhat guys seem to think static binaries are a good
> idea and install a static rpm by default.  Which it is not, not even
> without a buggy dynamic linker.

Static rpm 2.4.8 +fixes works
Dynamic 2.4.8 crashes on startup every time

> Ok.  I stopped communicating with the Redhat guys shortly before I left the
> US.  Essentially they received a part of the patches that I don't classify
> as ugly hacks or work in progress.

No problem

> Some more packages like the binutils, gcc or libc are based on different
> versions and we should try to base our work on the same versions as Redhat
> does.

Right now Ive got chunks of bastardised 4.8 (eg with -O not -O2 to avoid
gcc blowing up on zsh) but hopefully I can knock those out over time

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>