[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [update] [patch] linux: Cache coherency fixes

To: Ralf Baechle <>
Subject: Re: [update] [patch] linux: Cache coherency fixes
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 20:49:18 +0200 (MET DST)
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: Technical University of Gdansk
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> should have a somewhat older manual (must have!) and
> as well.  The geniouses at NEC stripped the description of
> the cache instruction from their manual so it you really want both manuals.

 Thanks for the reference.

> >  Hmm, what's wrong with "#ifndef"?  Not much less readable than "#ifdef",
> > IMO. 
> Just a small detail.  Nest conditions several times and the spaghetti
> starts :-)

 Well, that should be avoided whether the condition is positive or
negative.  Comments after "#else", "#elif" and "#end" might help a bit if
a discipline is kept. 

> > Basically:
> > 
> > 1. Does the CPU support coherency?
> > 
> > 2. If so, does the system?
> > 
> > I'm going to express it this way in the config script.
> Have fun expressing if a R4000 variant supports coherency :-)  You can't
> if you don't want to introduce even more R4000 types or subtypes.

 Who said I don't want to? ;-)  Not a big deal at this stage.

> None such MIPS system known where this is a sensible mode of operation -
> and I've hacked quite a number of platforms.  Anyway, if there were such
> systems they'd either have to be considered as coherent or as non-coherent.

 Thanks for the clarification.

> Our current model doesn't permit any finer grained configuration and unless
> such a system actually exists I don't think we should introduce one.

 Sure, but a one point we'll have an option to select the model at the run
time anyway.  At least this is one of goals I'd like to see fulfilled in
the future. 

+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+        e-mail:, PGP key available        +

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>