On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 08:31:40PM +0200, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 06:55:23PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > I've just commited Linux 2.2.8 into the CVS archive. Once this is
> > finished I'll create a branch named linux_2_2 for the 2.2 development
> > in the archive. If you just do ``cvs update'' you'll stay on the
> > mainline of the development, that is 2.3. If you want to work with
> > the 2.2 sources then you'll have to add the option ``-r linux_2_2''
> > to your next cvs update or cvs co command.
> > I'm already running 2.2.9 and 2.3.1 on my Indy but the checkin is that
> > slow that I won't commit these versions into the CVS archive now.
> I would appreciate if it was possible to continue using 32 bit code on the
> even if you add 64 bit code. Maybe we can add it as an option in the kernel
> configuration scripts?
I'll implement MIPS64 as a new architecture just like sparc64 is different
from sparc. The changes are too big and I finally want to use the
freedem to use all the tricks in the box. It also means that we'll have
some more of a maintenance pain for the common code for mips and mips64.