[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More Linux/SGI status

To: (Miguel de Icaza)
Subject: Re: More Linux/SGI status
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 16:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <> from "Miguel de Icaza" at Oct 7, 97 05:41:38 pm

>    Ralf's fixes to the dynamic linker fixed the Xt applications.  Now,
> only the PAM remains to be fixed.

The PAM problem is also a dynamic linker problem.  It's (I hope) one the
last major showstopper class bugs that prevent just building a
Linux/MIPS distribution from 95% unchanged source packages - and
fullfilling all the promises to those loading hardware to me ...

Btw, I stopped the mega load test (Running many compilers and tools in
parallel) I posted recently after some more hours because the machine ran
out of swap, some processes died therefore and load < 100 isn't that
interesting ...

System call latencies were pretty lousy bad for MIPS kernel because
we were using a syscall handler written in C.  I rewrote the entire
thing in assembler and now we're as fast as a MMX Pentium accounting
for the different clock rates.  Pretty nice, because we actually have
to save/restore many more registers and deal with a more complex
system call convention.  Seven nops left to eleminate ...

>    So, where do we stand now?  So, the only bits missing now are:
>       1. me finishing the support for the X server.  just a hack
>          here and there.
>       1.b. Getting the other important bits of the RRM code in the
>          kernel. 
>       2. me fixing the mouse.
>       3. Would it be possible to negotiate with SGI management 
>          the posibility of shipping the IRIX runtime libraries and
>          the X server as found on IRIX with a Linux disrtibution?

Bad point in time, it has been pointed out to me that SGI's stock
was doing pretty bad ;-)

>       4. A nice, easy-to use install program.  Taking the existing
>          Red Hat/Mustand install program and port it should be
>          pretty easy. 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>