[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MILO on NEC RISCstation 2200

Subject: Re: MILO on NEC RISCstation 2200
From: Systemkennung Linux <>
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 01:05:10 +0200 (MET DST)
In-reply-to: <> from "Warner Losh" at May 6, 96 10:33:43 am

> : Completly unrelated - the new libc 960501 is significantly better than
> : the old.  I've just built a usable bash and do a native recompile of
> : the lib to get rid of some crosscompiltion artefacts.
> Cool.  Your system is sounding stable if it is able to do that.  libc
> isn't small :-)

You think this is *big*?  I've already stripped all local symbols out of
the archive.  Otherwise libc.a would be far bigger.

Indeed my system is relativly useable now.  Crash reason #1 during the
last time was my IDE disk, which I already had thrown away because of
too many read errors ...  I just had digged it out again because I don't
own no other IDE disk. The whole thing is however still not 100%
reliable.  The stupid thing with the remaining bugs that crash the kernel
is, that they rarely leave a useable information for debugging - but I'm
working on 'em.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>