On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:53:47PM -0700, Jim Freeman wrote:
> To: email@example.com
Please don't post to linux-cvs; this list is only intended as an announce-
ment list for CVS commits.
> In comparing the stock 2.4.1 kernel sources with this AM's mips CVS
> update, I found the following differences in portions of the tree
> where mips-isms aren't involved :
> Directories that stock 2.4.1 has, but mips/CVS doesn't
> (if added to mips/CVS repository and sync'd against stock 2.4.1,
> the mips vs stock diff would be saner?) :
> Non-mips related directories mips has, but not present in stock 2.4.1
> (all empty, except for CVS-relate overhead - should be trimmed out of CVS?) :
cvs update -d -P
Wtf people don't read documentation?
We had five directories which only contained .cvsignore files, though.