Difference between revisions of "User:Tsbogend"
From LinuxMIPS
m (→Testmachines) |
(→Status) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Status == | == Status == | ||
| − | * RM200-225 stable | + | * RM200-225 stable, no EISA support, no VGA |
* RM200-C40 stable | * RM200-C40 stable | ||
| − | * RM300-C50 | + | * RM300-C50 stable |
* RM300-E50 UP: stable, no SMP support yet | * RM300-E50 UP: stable, no SMP support yet | ||
| − | * RM400-220 stable | + | * RM400-220 stable |
| − | * RM400-430 stable | + | * RM400-430 stable |
* RM400-440 not tested, but should be like RM400-430 | * RM400-440 not tested, but should be like RM400-430 | ||
* RM400-C72 UP: stable, SMP: slave CPU comes up; missing IPI | * RM400-C72 UP: stable, SMP: slave CPU comes up; missing IPI | ||
Revision as of 13:54, 18 May 2007
I'm working on getting Linux to run on RM200/300/400 with big endian firmware.
Test machines
- RM200-225 (flo)
- RM200-C40
- RM300-C50
- RM300-E50
- RM400-220
- RM400-430
- RM400-440 (flo)
- RM400-C72
- RM400-E60
I'm looking for more machine, so if you want to dump a machine mail me tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
Status
- RM200-225 stable, no EISA support, no VGA
- RM200-C40 stable
- RM300-C50 stable
- RM300-E50 UP: stable, no SMP support yet
- RM400-220 stable
- RM400-430 stable
- RM400-440 not tested, but should be like RM400-430
- RM400-C72 UP: stable, SMP: slave CPU comes up; missing IPI
- RM400-E60 UP: stable, no SMP support yet
I'm taking snapshots of my tree, you can find them here
Todos
- sort out serial stuff to get proper SC26xx support
- get IPI working on C72
- SMP support for RM300 E50 and RM400 E60
