| To: | riscy@pyramid.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: EISA/arc 100 |
| From: | Bill Broadley <broadley@neurocog.lrdc.pitt.edu> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Aug 1993 12:08:08 -0500 (EDT) |
| In-reply-to: | <9308111534.AA23583@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de> from "Andreas Busse" at Aug 11, 93 05:34:06 pm |
| Reply-to: | riscy@pyramid.com |
| Sender: | owner-riscy@pyramid.com |
> > The Nec chipset can handle lots of buffered dma devices for on board > > goodies, but I believe the implementation of the arc 100 motherboard > > puts almost nothing on the motherboard. > > What's about that famous ARC 150 board ? Well my impression was the ARC 100 board was for the 4000PC or 4400PC, and the arc 150 was for the 4400SC and 4000SC. So no difference except a bigger cpu socket and cache chips. -- Bill 1st> Broadley@neurocog.lrdc.pitt.edu Broadley@schneider3.lrdc.pitt.edu <2nd 3rd> Broadley+@pitt.edu Linux is great. Bike to live, live to bike. PGP-ok |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: EISA/arc 100, Andreas Busse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | MIPS Magnum 4000 parts, Andreas Busse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: EISA/arc 100, Andreas Busse |
| Next by Thread: | MIPS Magnum 4000 parts, Andreas Busse |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |