Stephen P Hill writes:
> My $0.02:
>
> A second level cache would be really, really nice. But it sounds
> like it will be out of our price range. Unless it proves
> (somehow) to be cheep to have an unpopulated 2nd level cache
> on the board, it is time to forget it.
From what I understand, the ARC chipset provides secondary cache
support. So we could easily end up with unpopulated 2nd level
cache sockets for very small additional cost.
--
Neil Russell (The wizard from OZ)
Pyramid Technology Email: caret@pyramid.com
3860 N. First Street Voice: (408) 428-7302
San Jose, CA 95134-1702 FAX: (408) 428-8845
|