| To: | riscy@pyramid.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Mips project Go or Wait? |
| From: | tor@tss.no (Tor Arntsen) |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Aug 1993 15:43:54 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | Andreas Busse <andy@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de> "Re: Mips project Go or Wait?" (Aug 3, 2:21pm) |
| Reply-to: | riscy@pyramid.com |
| Sender: | owner-riscy@pyramid.com |
On Aug 3, 2:21pm, Andreas Busse wrote: >We should try tro decide between R3xxx and R4xxx solutions. If >we all agree over a R4xxx machine things will be clearer. >When we have enough information about the different flavours >of R4xxx CPUs we can decide which one to use. > >Agreed ? I would vote for R4xxx. Tor (tor@tss.no) (I have been on vacation for a while (still am), not following the discussions. I guess others are as well, causing the quietness on the list..) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mips project Go or Wait?, Andreas Busse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mips project Go or Wait?, Tommy Thorn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mips project Go or Wait?, Amos Shapira |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mips project Go or Wait?, Alan Krantz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |