| To: | riscy@pyramid.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Should we have SCSI? |
| From: | Drew Eckhardt <drew@caesar.cs.Colorado.EDU> |
| Date: | Tue, 06 Jul 1993 15:25:30 -0600 |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Tue, 06 Jul 1993 16:16:34 CDT." <9307062116.AA10815@ubitrex.mb.ca> |
| Reply-to: | riscy@pyramid.com |
| Sender: | riscy-request@pyramid.com |
> IMHO, the 53cf90 series is the best choice I've seen so far, I don't
> know about the Western Digital chip, but it rings a bell as the chip
> used in the WD7000 controller.
NCR 53cf90 sounds fine, assuming the pricing holds (US$19.45). I assume
the "cf" is faster than the "c"? The data you gave didn't say why one woul
d
pay the US$1.85 more for the "cf".
The 53cf90/53c94 chips are fast-SCSI II versions of the 53c90/53c94.
--------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ethernet on the motherboard?, Tim Braun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Board production WHOOAAA!, Dan Fishman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Should we have SCSI?, Tim Braun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Should we have SCSI?, Aki Atoji |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |