>I've been using a TMS34010-based X-terminal. I must agree that it is not
Maybe I'm a bit unfair here, that terminal is also running the X-server
in the 34010.
>but it is not as slow as e.g. cheap NCD-terminals (I have no
>idea what's inside those). The TMS-based one is kind of middle of the road.
>A Sun SLC running X is faster, HP X-terms (pa-based I think) are much much
But I think the HP X-terms do the equivalent, i.e. I think they use the
pa-chip to do both the video and the X-server. I may be on thin ice here.