linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly.

To: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly.
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:07:37 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <1389992630-64139-1-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1389992630-64139-1-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:03:50PM -0600, Steven J. Hill wrote:

> The 1074K is a multiprocessing coherent processing system (CPS) based
> on modified 74K cores. This patch makes the 1074K an actual unique
> CPU type, instead of a 74K derivative, which it is not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
> Reviewed-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>

I've also come to the conclusion that this seems to be the right
thing.  I'm still undecided on the urgency, 3.14 or later?  For now I'm
going to drop this into the 3.15 queue.

Thanks,

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>