linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: prlimit64: inconsistencies between kernel and userland

To: aurelien@aurel32.net
Subject: Re: prlimit64: inconsistencies between kernel and userland
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:45:19 -0500 (EST)
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20131104213756.GD18700@hall.aurel32.net>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20130628133835.GA21839@hall.aurel32.net> <20131104213756.GD18700@hall.aurel32.net>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:37:56 +0100

> Any news about this issue? It really starts to causes a lot of issues in
> Debian. I have added a Cc: to libc people so that we can also hear their
> opinion.

I had the same exact problem on sparc several years ago, I simply fixed
the glibc header value, it's the only way to fix this.

Yes, that means you then have to recompile applications and libraries
that reference this value.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>