[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Get rid of SUBARCH

To: Rob Landley <>, Richard Weinberger <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Get rid of SUBARCH
From: David Daney <>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:55:20 -0700
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <>, Sam Ravnborg <>, Linux-Arch <>, Michal Marek <>, Ralf Baechle <>, Paul Mundt <>, Jeff Dike <>, Guan Xuetao <>, Thomas Gleixner <>, Ingo Molnar <>, "H. Peter Anvin" <>, the arch/x86 maintainers <>, linux-kbuild <>, "" <>, linux-m68k <>, Linux MIPS Mailing List <>, Linux-sh list <>, uml-devel <>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KnhN6jVTfBh15tGqs3VVEHUPdCxgHMF/Vfm52t7+1jk=; b=k91e7ySU6KDxw9nYWhu4nmNqCbTWgICsK+ltLMV0Q03rLNx28C/DKXR9kgsfQiswv1 If5W+pj6Lyp+d21cQlRJwEKuv/AJ6b37XUpqOnVgazXtYpRZLukmroH+QfsgEsurBsYD +T2P8XGSfbqKmKhqUhhmiMVLenkdaHsufh2C7TP9leWDSyNftkCcAy9fVYXPmnQLSZPU SbpkDlIeZdyi+7hAisk7asTa0hH6at/aYxhk+axtdk/CNReUhBtFkFrP33gW7IJmACmZ 8FBgEoriwzk2srtQWNOZZVJxlvSvhRu74P/HSSaY7qMaPPAysUHfwJJij2tWoL6xkzR1 +wbQ==
In-reply-to: <1377204069.2737.108@driftwood>
List-archive: <>
List-help: <>
List-id: linux-mips <>
List-owner: <>
List-post: <>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <>
List-unsubscribe: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <> <1377204069.2737.108@driftwood>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
On 08/22/2013 01:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 08/22/2013 07:58:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg <> wrote:
>> > The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32.
>> > These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH !=
>> > Do really need that behavior?
>> This does remove functionality.
>> It allows to build a kernel using e.g. "make ARCH=m68k".
>> Perhaps this can be moved to generic code? Most (not all!)
>> are called $ARCH-{unknown-,}linux{,-gnu}.
>> Exceptions are e.g. am33_2.0-linux and bfin-uclinux.
> Today you can specify CROSS_COMPILE in Kconfig.
> With this we should be able to remove these hacks.

The correct CROSS_COMPILE value depends on the host environment, not
on the target configuration.

Actually it depends on _both_.

I think the important issue is not the exact dependencies of the value of CROSS_COMPILE, but rather that it varies enough that automatically choosing a value based on SUBARCH often gives the wrong result.

Removing SUBARCH and setting CROSS_COMPILE either from the make command line (or environment) or the config file, is a good idea because it simplifies the build system, makes things clearer, and yields more predictable results.

David Daney

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>