linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: of_pci_range_parser patch series

To: ralf@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: of_pci_range_parser patch series
From: Andrew Murray <amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:29:44 +0100
Cc: Andrew.Murray@arm.com, monstr@monstr.eu, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, blogic@openwrt.org, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, jason@lakedaemon.net
In-reply-to: <BF39C5705592B0469C55326EC158C01A80307EBE26@GEORGE.Emea.Arm.com>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <BF39C5705592B0469C55326EC158C01A80307EBE26@GEORGE.Emea.Arm.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
> Andrew,
> 
> I noticed that [1] is now in -next but not the MIPS patch [2], not the
> MicroBlaze patch [3].  What is the reason for that?  If it's only the
> lack of an ack, here's mine for the MIPS version:

There was no reason other that the missing acks.

> 
> Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

Thanks for this.

Jason - is it possible/best to take this through your tree?

Andrew Murray

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>   Ralf
> 
> [1] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5218/
> [2] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5217/
> [3] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5216/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>