linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: OCTEON: Rename Kconfig CAVIUM_OCTEON_REFERENCE_BOARD t

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: OCTEON: Rename Kconfig CAVIUM_OCTEON_REFERENCE_BOARD to CAVIUM_OCTEON_SOC
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:13:50 -0700
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>, <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net>, <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
In-reply-to: <20130522122232.GD10769@linux-mips.org>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1369088378-13957-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <20130521220457.GF31836@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> <519BF01B.1010600@caviumnetworks.com> <20130522122232.GD10769@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4
On 05/22/2013 05:22 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:07:23PM -0700, David Daney wrote:

  config USB_OCTEON_OHCI
        bool "Octeon on-chip OHCI support"
-       depends on CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON
+       depends on  CAVIUM_OCTEON_SOC

Just a minor comment, here the extra whitespace after "depends on"
could be eliminated.


Good point.  I will regenerate the patch to correct this.

I took care of that and queued the patch.


Can you take v2 instead? It has the missing watchdog adjustment that is not in v1.

Thanks,
David Daney



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>