linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty: serial: ralink: fix SERIAL_8250_RT288X dependency

To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty: serial: ralink: fix SERIAL_8250_RT288X dependency
From: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 05:57:26 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
In-reply-to: <20130415181527.GA25341@kroah.com>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1365845973-16164-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <20130415181527.GA25341@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
On 15/04/13 20:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:39:32AM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
With every Ralink SoC that we add, we would need to extend the dependency. In
order to make life easier we make the symbol depend on MIPS&  RALINK and then
select it from within arch/mips/ralink/.

Signed-off-by: John Crispin<blogic@openwrt.org>
---

These 2 patches in this series should be merged via the mips tree. Patch 1/2
requires an Ack from the tty maintainer.

  drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig |    4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig
index 80fe91e..24ea3c8 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig
@@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ config SERIAL_8250_EM
          If unsure, say N.

  config SERIAL_8250_RT288X
-       bool "Ralink RT288x/RT305x/RT3662/RT3883 serial port support"
-       depends on SERIAL_8250&&  (SOC_RT288X || SOC_RT305X || SOC_RT3883)
+       bool
+       depends on SERIAL_8250&&  MIPS&&  RALINK

This patch doesn't create a select anywhere, so how can a user know what
to do here?

greg k-h

Hi Greg,

The select happens in patch 2/2. i split it up as it touches a different subsystem. I can put both changes into the same patch. would that be acceptable ?

    John

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>