linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC 08/11] MIPS: ralink: adds early_printk support

To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/11] MIPS: ralink: adds early_printk support
From: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:57:44 +0100
In-reply-to: <5100610A.80609@mvista.com>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
References: <1358942755-25371-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <1358942755-25371-9-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <5100610A.80609@mvista.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120922 Icedove/10.0.7
On 23/01/13 23:15, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.

On 23-01-2013 16:05, John Crispin wrote:

Add the code needed to make early printk work.

Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
---
arch/mips/ralink/early_printk.c | 43
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/mips/ralink/early_printk.c

diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/early_printk.c
b/arch/mips/ralink/early_printk.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c610084
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/mips/ralink/early_printk.c
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/*
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
published
+ * by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/serial_reg.h>

BTW, I don't see that file in the current Linus' tree... and in
linux-next too.

WBR, Sergei



Hi,

./include/uapi/linux/serial_reg.h

if i recall correctly they differ to the defaults. all the defines were added as reference even if only a few are used. i will have a closer look at this today

        John

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>