Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.

[Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 02:24:26PM -0800, David Daney wrote:

> ... In the very last BITFIELD_FIELD(), you need a valid token as the
> second parameter, otherwise (according to Pinski) C90 behavior is
> undefined.
> 
> Use a ';'

While Andrew is correct, I don't think this argument matters unless
we're going to export <asm/inst.h> to userspace.  Should we?  Historically
it was meant to be exported and accessed by application code from
<sys/inst.h>.

  Ralf