[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "nohz: Fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /pro

To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "nohz: Fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat" (commit 7386cdbf2f57ea8cff3c9fde93f206e58b9fe13f).
From: Sergei Shtylyov <>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:42:30 +0300
Cc: Russell King <>, "Paul E. McKenney" <>, Stephen Boyd <>,, Mike Frysinger <>,, Ralf Baechle <>,, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <>,, Martin Schwidefsky <>,, Paul Mundt <>,, "David S. Miller" <>,, Thomas Gleixner <>, Ingo Molnar <>, "H. Peter Anvin" <>,,,,,
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <>
List-help: <>
List-id: linux-mips <>
List-owner: <>
List-post: <>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <>
List-unsubscribe: <>
References: <> <> <>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 01/04/2013 10:29 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:

>>> With offline cpus no longer beeing seen in nohz mode (ts->idle_active=0), we
>>> don't need the check for cpu_online() introduced in commit 7386cdbf. Offline

>>    Please also specify the summary of that commit in parens (or
>> however you like).

> I had that in Subject line, but yes would be good to include in commit message
> as well. I will incorporate that change alongwith anything else required in
> next version of this patch.

   Ah, that was a revert with atypical subject -- didn't notice. Then there's no
need to specify it twice.

> - vatsa

WBR, Sergei

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>