| To: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@paralogos.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is r25 saved across syscalls? |
| From: | David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:27:55 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p4PjrGXx3lKLKp2kQnzLpCiIVrj9McRvZZ4761IaWAQ=; b=ucoG0MgH+9kaDRxQSpCOmglFe+uxWtSiMJ9FaJFL5iDrzJ3SfHyIO+6b8XaqnZ+KNv dmjlrgWnH8URWtNYXPXWsskei8jeV1W0/uMW1beTarcYkuW3IEaGyjfn53+ow5quBkUm R77RY5rFkaffAEpfrjexBFGKeZWp6WyGH6/+//Ki5N2k5nkFliTX+kKcSYwzLvHUIOzL Cta6pPKxhFdPpR7PkXHdQp3MUO87gsyWNBQP5Ay21X11oCJvd7TqBMXwQjg85fbKhSPL ehE3GbkPM734PdHeS5fkexap6cGCYg5oFH6fWR7i+Up+VSjKROT+YGOc9rby/AYGwL1B diWw== |
| In-reply-to: | <504E8E27.5030904@paralogos.com> |
| List-archive: | <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/> |
| List-help: | <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help> |
| List-id: | linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org> |
| List-owner: | <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| List-software: | Ecartis version 1.0.0 |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips> |
| References: | <20120909193008.GA15157@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120910170830.GB24448@linux-mips.org> <20120910172248.GN27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1209110059580.8926@eddie.linux-mips.org> <504E8E27.5030904@paralogos.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 |
On 09/10/2012 06:04 PM, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: On 09/10/2012 05:29 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:I do wonder however why we have these instructions to save/restore $25 in SAVE_SOME/RESTORE_SOME. This dates back to 2.4 at the very least. Ralf, any insights?Hi, guys. Maybe the fact that it's used for dispatching PIC calls has something to do with it? I don't think so. It is call clobbered in all Linux ABIs. So there is never a need to save it. It even has the pseudonym of $t9 indicating that it will get clobbered. The other call clobbered registers that happen to be saved are for the nefarious uses of the kernel itself (a0..a6 for system call restarting), I think this is just left over cruft. David Daney /K. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Is r25 saved across syscalls?, Kevin D. Kissell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is r25 saved across syscalls?, Rich Felker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is r25 saved across syscalls?, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is r25 saved across syscalls?, Rich Felker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |