linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: Netlogic: XLP defconfig update

To: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: Netlogic: XLP defconfig update
From: "Jayachandran C." <jchandra@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:27:46 +0530
Cc: "Jayachandran C" <jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20120821125221.GC2550@linux-mips.org>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
References: <1342196605-4260-1-git-send-email-jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com> <1342196605-4260-13-git-send-email-jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com> <20120821125221.GC2550@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:52:21PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:53:25PM +0530, Jayachandran C wrote:
> 
> > +CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y
> > +CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_ICS=y
> > +CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_RISCIX=y
> > +CONFIG_OSF_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_AMIGA_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_ATARI_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL=y
> > +CONFIG_MINIX_SUBPARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_UNIXWARE_DISKLABEL=y
> > +CONFIG_LDM_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_SGI_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_ULTRIX_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_SUN_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_KARMA_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y
> > +CONFIG_SYSV68_PARTITION=y
> 
> Plenty of weird partition types enabled in this config update; you may
> want to review the config file for a future version.  Unless you really
> want to be able to deal with 1980's partitioning schemes, of course.

This seems to be present from the very first version, and got rearranged
when I regenerated this file. Will clean this up with the next update.

Thanks,
JC.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>