linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2] Add MIPS64R2 core support.

To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add MIPS64R2 core support.
From: "Yegoshin, Leonid" <yegoshin@mips.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:04 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "Hill, Steven" <sjhill@mips.com>, "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, "ralf@linux-mips.org" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <4FAD4E5C.9040607@mvista.com>
References: <1336717784-853-1-git-send-email-sjhill@mips.com>,<4FAD4B9E.70803@mvista.com> <ajcsenx2bmwqyi5629d3ywgh.1336757525517@email.android.com>,<4FAD4E5C.9040607@mvista.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Thread-index: AQHNLz96CllJsX0FZEaOw1mYtE0YCZbFTREA//+MbJCAAHbZAP//jMPc
Thread-topic: [PATCH v2] Add MIPS64R2 core support.
I don't see any advantage in separation of it.


Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com> wrote:


Hello.

On 05/11/2012 09:32 PM, Yegoshin, Leonid wrote:

> Not exactly - it adds 64R2 support in Malta, plus small verification that 
> build kernel could run 32bit binaries.

> I don't think it has sense to multiply patches here, there is no sense to 
> have this separated.

> 5KEc is just test-bed.

    Well, rule of thumb is do one thing per patch. You do three. All that
without proper description.

WBR, Sergei

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>