| To: | David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cavium: Don't enable irq in ->init__secondary() |
| From: | Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:08:48 +0800 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KHWZGjbF8JmOp5ELestiWaj5wwigfe1u5dxF9/WtJBA=; b=smGL1PdQG5i0JQFfvJS0W9Q46eDHSWuO4Oo6ED7BIUKq6VY2jaHsTXMzUrCOe2iiyn uiQqmacWPQWzubJDDeDuUFcn/uR9pyeBj1x7zDaB/salTfC8C1tZO7D9C9al8aGOFpOu zIVV/U7Oi5LIZcjE65MK4iM1DododudhW7A6fXtK2JB7Ah7uakmkZnC+ixBd1iIO2opp sTydaP1j6aZTIZxtTnS9BzyFr58nCsGAmnSdkfZ0IJoSHvauYcvdeEgRtkTTiXC2zfzR 0B2+jR7YjKpYaVLgnUlBEfPnCim/KyEj23edFQEUboKSo2epqSa0XTi9fKbBL23Y4PTl byBQ== |
| In-reply-to: | <4F8C4D4E.4060900@gmail.com> |
| References: | <1334561133-19139-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <4F8C4D4E.4060900@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:48:14AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 12:25 AM, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >From: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang@windriver.com>
> >
> >Too early to enable irq will break some following action,
> >such as notify_cpu_starting().
>
> Can you be more specific about what breaks?
For example:
CPU1 CPU2
__cpu_up();
mp_ops->boot_secondary();
start_secondary();
octeon_init_secondary();
raw_local_irq_enable();
<IRQ>
do something;
wake up softirqd;
try_to_wake_up();
select_fallback_rq();
/* select wrong cpu */
set_cpu_online();
>
> >
> >I don't get side effect with this patch.
>
> Without this, where do irqs get enabled on the secondary CPUs?
cpu_idle() will handle it. But in fact we should not depend on
cpu_idle().
But it seems there is not suitable place to put local_irq_enable(),
though ->smp_finish() looks like a more suitable place.
When looking more at smp support on MIPS, there is more things I find.
Such as set_cpu_online() is called on CPU1, so there will be another race
window like above scenario. Please take a look at what commit 2baab4e9
intend to resolve.
Thanks,
Yong
>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> >Cc: David Daney<ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
> >Cc: Ralf Baechle<ralf@linux-mips.org>
> >---
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c | 1 -
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >index 97e7ce9..7e65c88 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit octeon_init_secondary(void)
> > octeon_init_cvmcount();
> >
> > octeon_irq_setup_secondary();
> >- raw_local_irq_enable();
> > }
> >
> > /**
--
Only stand for myself
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH v3 3/3] netdev/of/phy: Add MDIO bus multiplexer driven by GPIO lines., David Daney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] netdev/of/phy: New function: of_mdio_find_bus()., David Daney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cavium: Don't enable irq in ->init__secondary(), David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cavium: Don't enable irq in ->init__secondary(), David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |