linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support.

To: Leonid Yegoshin <yegoshin@mips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support.
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:53:52 +0400
Cc: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <4F849017.1020706@mips.com>
References: <1333987461-822-1-git-send-email-sjhill@mips.com> <4F841E48.7000104@mvista.com> <4F848576.6040204@mips.com> <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com> <4F849017.1020706@mips.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
Hello.

On 10-04-2012 23:55, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:

+config 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR
+ bool "Kernel supports 64 bit physical addresses" if EXPERIMENTAL
+ depends on 64BIT

This option is selected on 32-bit CPUs like Alchemy, which has 36-bit
physical address. It will cause a warning about unmet

Just verified - selected Alchemy and DB1000 board and got

# CONFIG_64BIT is not set
CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR=y
CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y

???

And you didn't get a warning on "select 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR"? Strange, modern
Kconfig should spit out one...

OK, you right, I missed it in bunch of another. It has sense to add a missed
dependency.

   You mean to remove it? There's nothing you can add.

- Leonid.

WBR, Sergei

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>