On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 09:15:39PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>> When flushing TLB, if @vma is backed by huge page, we could flush huge TLB,
>> due to that huge page is defined to be far from normal page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>
> It seems this patch is identical to
> https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/2825/ which I've already applied?
>
Maybe you forget the following message:)
btw, I want to change
+ size = (end - start) >> HPAGE_SHIFT;
to
+ size = (end - start) / HPAGE_SIZE;
if it is not too late.
Best regards
Hillf
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:09:37PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>> Subject: Flush huge TLB
>> From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>>
>> When flushing TLB, if @vma is backed by huge page, we could flush huge TLB,
>> due to that huge page is defined to be far from normal page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>
> I assume this 2nd version was actually meant to be applied, not just for RFC
> so I've queued it for 3.3. But you better remove that RFC from subject and
> start a fresh mail thread when posting a patch to avoid confusion!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ralf
>
|