Hello.
On 17-11-2011 20:42, John Crispin wrote:
The return values of request_irq() were not checked leading to the following
error message.
drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c: In function 'ltq_etop_hw_init':
drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c:368:15: warning: ignoring return value of
'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c:377:15: warning: ignoring return value of
'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
Signed-off-by: John Crispin<blogic@openwrt.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c
index 9fd6779..dddb9fe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c
[...]
@@ -364,21 +365,22 @@ ltq_etop_hw_init(struct net_device *dev)
if (IS_TX(i)) {
ltq_dma_alloc_tx(&ch->dma);
- request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ err = request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, IRQF_DISABLED,
BTW, IRQF_DISABLED is a nop now, so could have dropped it...
"etop_tx", priv);
} else if (IS_RX(i)) {
ltq_dma_alloc_rx(&ch->dma);
for (ch->dma.desc = 0; ch->dma.desc< LTQ_DESC_NUM;
ch->dma.desc++)
if (ltq_etop_alloc_skb(ch))
- return -ENOMEM;
+ err = -ENOMEM;
ch->dma.desc = 0;
- request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ err = request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, IRQF_DISABLED,
Same here.
WBR, Sergei
|