[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Flush huge TLB

To: Hillf Danton <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Flush huge TLB
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:52:56 +0000
Cc: David Daney <>,, "Jayachandran C." <>
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:09:37PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:

> Subject: Flush huge TLB
> From: Hillf Danton <>
> When flushing TLB, if @vma is backed by huge page, we could flush huge TLB,
> due to that huge page is defined to be far from normal page.
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <>
> Acked-by: David Daney <>

I assume this 2nd version was actually meant to be applied, not just for RFC
so I've queued it for 3.3.  But you better remove that RFC from subject and
start a fresh mail thread when posting a patch to avoid confusion!



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RFC] Flush huge TLB, Ralf Baechle <=