linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Flush huge TLB

To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Flush huge TLB
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:52:56 +0000
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, "Jayachandran C." <jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com>
In-reply-to: <CAJd=RBA4c9Gs1jsftPCi9hd7UDa_UaO86-4qo=FHp4RB+m98kQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJd=RBBPd6frOA5zCg5juHuWdZ6wHzmOhhufgGhUCOc=rkNEzA@mail.gmail.com> <4E932897.9050301@cavium.com> <CAJd=RBA4c9Gs1jsftPCi9hd7UDa_UaO86-4qo=FHp4RB+m98kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:09:37PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:

> Subject: Flush huge TLB
> From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> 
> When flushing TLB, if @vma is backed by huge page, we could flush huge TLB,
> due to that huge page is defined to be far from normal page.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>

I assume this 2nd version was actually meant to be applied, not just for RFC
so I've queued it for 3.3.  But you better remove that RFC from subject and
start a fresh mail thread when posting a patch to avoid confusion!

Thanks,

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RFC] Flush huge TLB, Ralf Baechle <=