| To: | Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Flush huge TLB |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:52:56 +0000 |
| Cc: | David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, "Jayachandran C." <jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <CAJd=RBA4c9Gs1jsftPCi9hd7UDa_UaO86-4qo=FHp4RB+m98kQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <CAJd=RBBPd6frOA5zCg5juHuWdZ6wHzmOhhufgGhUCOc=rkNEzA@mail.gmail.com> <4E932897.9050301@cavium.com> <CAJd=RBA4c9Gs1jsftPCi9hd7UDa_UaO86-4qo=FHp4RB+m98kQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:09:37PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Subject: Flush huge TLB > From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> > > When flushing TLB, if @vma is backed by huge page, we could flush huge TLB, > due to that huge page is defined to be far from normal page. > > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> > Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> I assume this 2nd version was actually meant to be applied, not just for RFC so I've queued it for 3.3. But you better remove that RFC from subject and start a fresh mail thread when posting a patch to avoid confusion! Thanks, Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] MIPS: Add board support for Loongson1B, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: Alchemy: db1200: improve PB1200 detection., Manuel Lauss |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] MIPS: Add board support for Loongson1B, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: Alchemy: db1200: improve PB1200 detection., Manuel Lauss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |