| To: | Jayachandran C <jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: Netlogic: Mark Netlogic chips as SMT capable |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:38:33 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20111111125436.GD28303@linux-mips.org> |
| References: | <cover.1321010998.git.jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com> <7a1a9bad5b110e931f1662ebaae4c0164d4dcc84.1321011002.git.jayachandranc@netlogicmicro.com> <20111111125436.GD28303@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:54:36PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:11:08PM +0530, Hillf Danton wrote: > > Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:11:08 +0530 > > From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> > > Normally if you're resending other people's patches they should be sent > out with your email in the email's From: header and with the patch > author's name and Email address in a From: line in the first (important, > otherwise git won't parse it right) of the body. Somehow here Hillf > ended up in the From: header which may be confusing, might upset him > and might also trigger spam filters. > > No need to resend but you may want to fix that for the next batch of > patches. And promptly the reply went to Hillf, whops :) Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2 6/8] MIPS: Add NMI notifier, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: Netlogic: Mark Netlogic chips as SMT capable, Hillf Danton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: Netlogic: Mark Netlogic chips as SMT capable, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 12/12] MIPS: Netlogic: Mark Netlogic chips as SMT capable, Hillf Danton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |