linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH 12/49] MIPS: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED

from [Yong Zhang] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/49] MIPS: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:06:03 +0800
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BwXe+mLuYayTCJ+Iz2au3SN5WL4JnyzjmALIhLdMhjk=; b=L31EE6BvmpU7GYS6hwtk6Bn2cT8Kcezbvx1caecj3nXko4kyXqn2tIC+F6ioUsGFyY qpiss7VEXLIWrr8M0xhrn4do4UDvpxzei+Wa1ozkB8kHl3IzjuoEv81A5m+hX98I9jAB GMcxNpLBWmf6Hjf4QUZOtQCk7wQxN+ft/VZB8=
In-reply-to: <20111107134912.0878664493f1110ceefb98a6@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <1319277421-9203-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1319277421-9203-13-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <20111104122106.GA7581@linux-mips.org> <20111107021048.GA3027@zhy> <20111107134912.0878664493f1110ceefb98a6@canb.auug.org.au>
Reply-to: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) 
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:49:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yong,
> 
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:10:48 +0800 Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:21:06PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > > Thanks, queued for 3.3.  I resolved a conflict in dbdma.c and remove
> > > one IRQF_DISABLED which had been missed in arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c.
> > 
> > And FYI, my patch is based on next-20111014 when I made it.
> 
> You should never base anything on top of a linux-next tree.  You should
> use the tree you are fixing (Linus' or the Mips tree or ...) as the base.

Thanks for your reminding Stephen :)

So I guess 'basing on linux-next' also brings some trouble to tglx,
which is hard for him to pick them up.

I think I should base my patch on -tip for the leftovers, tglx?
Or let me know your opinion if you have different idea.

Thanks,
Yong
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH 12/49] MIPS: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED, Stephen Rothwell
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add fast get_user_pages, Ralf Baechle
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH 12/49] MIPS: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED, Stephen Rothwell
Next by Thread:  [PATCH] MIPS: remove port limit in ioport_map, Manuel Lauss
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]