On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 18:48 +0800, Chen Jie wrote:
> 2011/10/31 Yong Zhang <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Chen Jie <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> On MIPS, with maxsec=4, clocks_calc_mult_shift() may generate a very
> >> big mult, which may easily cause timekeeper.mult overflow within
> >> timekeeping jobs.
> > Hmmm, why not use clocksource_register_hz()/clocksource_register_khz()
> > instead? it's more convenient.
> Thanks for the suggestion. And sorry for I didn't notice the upstream
> code has already hooked to clocksource_register_hz() in csrc-r4k.c
> (We're using r4000 clock source)
> I'm afraid this still doesn't fix my case. Through
> I got a calculated maxsec = (0xffffffff - (0xffffffff>>5))/250000500 =
> 16 # assume mips_hpt_frequency=250000500
> With this maxsec, I got a mult of 0xffffde72, still too big.
Hrmm. Yong Zang is right to suggest clocksource_register_hz(), as the
intention of that code is to try to avoid these sorts of issues.
What is the corresponding shift value you're getting for the value
Could you annotate clocks_calc_mult_shift() a little bit to see where
things might be going wrong?