On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 07/22/2011 03:39 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:24:00AM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> >> On 07/22/2011 12:30 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>> 2011/7/16 Hauke Mehrtens <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> >>>> @Ralf: Could you please merger this into the mips tree so that it will
> >>>> be in linux-3.1.
> >>> ML for bcma is linux-wireless. Should we pass that patches "via" Ralf
> >>> or John? Using linux-wireless (and John's tree) makes more sense to
> >>> me, as we will work on the same tree and will get less merge
> >>> conflicts. However don't take me as Linux development style guru, just
> >>> my POV.
> >> I talked about this with Florian Fainelli and he said that the patches
> >> should rather pass Ralf then John, but merging would be easier when they
> >> are passing John. I do not have a problem with both solutions and
> >> rebasing it to an other tree is no problem for me.
> >> John and Ralf, who wants to take these patches? ;-)
> > I don't really care -- I figured Ralf was taking them due to the MIPS arch
> > bits.
> > John
> Hi John,
> yes because of the MIPS arch bits it should go through Ralf, but there
> are many changes for bcma in wireless-testing and adding my changes to
> mips tree will cause some problems when wireless-testing and mips are
> merged together by Linus.
I'm happy to take them if Ralf agrees. You'll need to repost them
(or at least send them to me again).
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
email@example.com might be all we have. Be ready.