linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] bcma: add support for embedded devices like bcm4716

To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>, ralf@linux-mips.org, "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] bcma: add support for embedded devices like bcm4716
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:24:00 +0200
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jonas.gorski@gmail.com, mb@bu3sch.de, george@znau.edu.ua, arend@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, bernhardloos@googlemail.com, arnd@arndb.de, julian.calaby@gmail.com, sshtylyov@mvista.com
In-reply-to: <CACna6ryjYGuLc5c88eke=gjgwQyVD+A9afM6zCRhqV1THHgWvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1310835342-18877-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <CACna6ryjYGuLc5c88eke=gjgwQyVD+A9afM6zCRhqV1THHgWvA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
On 07/22/2011 12:30 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2011/7/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
>> This patch series adds support for embedded devices like bcm47xx to
>> bcma. Bcma is used on bcm4716 and bcm4718 SoCs as the system bus and
>> replaced ssb used on older devices. With these patches my bcm4716
>> device boots up till it tries to access the flash, because the serial
>> flash chip is unsupported for now, this will be my next task. This adds
>> support for MIPS cores, interrupt configuration and the serial console.
>>
>> These patches are not containing all functions needed to get the SoC to
>> fully work and support every feature, but it is a good start.
>> These patches are now integrated in OpenWrt for everyone how wants to
>> test them.
>>
>> This was tested with a BCM4704 device (SoC with ssb bus), a BCM4716
>> device and a pcie wireless card supported by bcma.
>>
>>
>> @Rafał: If you are fine with the bcma patches could you please give
>> your Signed-off on them.
>>
>> @Ralf: Could you please merger this into the mips tree so that it will be in 
>> linux-3.1.
> 
> ML for bcma is linux-wireless. Should we pass that patches "via" Ralf
> or John? Using linux-wireless (and John's tree) makes more sense to
> me, as we will work on the same tree and will get less merge
> conflicts. However don't take me as Linux development style guru, just
> my POV.
> 
Hi,

Thank you for your reviewing.

I talked about this with Florian Fainelli and he said that the patches
should rather pass Ralf then John, but merging would be easier when they
are passing John. I do not have a problem with both solutions and
rebasing it to an other tree is no problem for me.
John and Ralf, who wants to take these patches? ;-)

Hauke

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>