| To: | Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] tty: 8250: handle USR for DesignWare 8250 with correct accessors |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:29:54 +0100 |
| Cc: | Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Marc St-Jean <bluezzer@gmail.com>, Shane McDonald <mcdonald.shane@gmail.com>, Anoop P A <anoop.pa@gmail.com> |
| Face: | 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 |
| In-reply-to: | <20110613091926.GB2472@pulham.picochip.com> |
| References: | <1307616525-22028-1-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com> <20110610035817.GA6740@linux-mips.org> <20110610075426.GM3711@pulham.picochip.com> <20110610145724.1e0c0983@bob.linux.org.uk> <20110613091926.GB2472@pulham.picochip.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:19:26 +0100 Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:57:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I found this series from Alan > > > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg03484.html) which looks > > > like it would do the job if we added the extra irq callback. Ideally > > > we just remove both of the UPIO_DWAPB and UPIO_DWAPB32 and let the > > > platform specify the ops. > > > > I've not yet had time to go back and revisit those patches and debug > > them so they actually work but as and when someone gets time I think > > it's the right basic path to follow, and the irq callback looks > > sensible too. > > As an intermediate step, how about adding the irq callback to > uart_8250_port and removing UPIO_DWAPB and UPIO_DWAPB32 from the driver? Feel free to - it makes the later job easier. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/5 v2] WATCHDOG: mtx1-wdt: request gpio before using it, Jamie Iles |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.6.39 on Cavium CN38xx, David Daney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] tty: 8250: handle USR for DesignWare 8250 with correct accessors, Jamie Iles |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] tty: 8250: handle USR for DesignWare 8250 with correct accessors, Shane McDonald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |