Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] bcma: add embedded bus

[Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>]

W dniu 6 czerwca 2011 12:32 użytkownik George Kashperko
<george@znau.edu.ua> napisał:
> Hi,
>
>> Hauke,
>>
>> My idea for naming schema was to use:
>> bcma_host_TYPE_*
>>
>> Like:
>> bcma_host_pci_*
>> bcma_host_sdio_*
>>
>> You are using:
>> bcma_host_bcma_*
>>
>> What do you think about changing this to:
>> bcma_host_embedded_*
>> or just some:
>> bcma_host_emb_*
>> ?
>>
>> Does it make more sense to you? I was trying to keep names in bcma
>> really clear, so every first-time-reader can see differences between
>> hosts, host and driver, etc.
>
> how about bcma_host_soc ?

We get then inconsistency with "BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED". I'd like to
1) See something like bcma_host_emb...
xor
2) Use bcma_host_soc_* and BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC

-- 
Rafał