linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] bcma: add embedded bus

To: George Kashperko <george@znau.edu.ua>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] bcma: add embedded bus
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:51:09 +0200
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, mb@bu3sch.de, arend@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, bernhardloos@googlemail.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3G5+F40d+VgUqD0ENGQDFp+UrjbfeCuiSiO8r6nyVTY=; b=a1MKq3Eanq1j5n9AkM6+HjyFmPsvwbKF52uByAj0Hw9CDvCPxP3di+TZflhrOKqH4z 1SMJMh1ftqOatrpqa3oaNrx2S9MD7ohBg3hPmUnyqDhnPOTtMK0l46k0JoAXYartJARZ MV8UzBeLpxhbjk9Rg1yMuJPx4SSV8s8XzwAoA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XcPHQH3qqo47aF0ylX7ZAb2ZZKrruvKZEZ+SCht3n/nRIKuygdKEEGOjQY2PxrZu+L btkO4OAfuFKenGfR/jtbVpOPzeeSdpIcCb+KqaK00k9wlFSCojB4VUNOc91OtI3DNgRi ORXVdvZ1d/RDjDzUiB/PsiPhOkC0Ei6yavb/8=
In-reply-to: <1307356322.28734.11.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
References: <1307311658-15853-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <1307311658-15853-4-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <BANLkTi=T6xO9q+vOCk5Fu+2J_nUTwX3dcg@mail.gmail.com> <1307356322.28734.11.camel@dev.znau.edu.ua>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
W dniu 6 czerwca 2011 12:32 użytkownik George Kashperko
<george@znau.edu.ua> napisał:
> Hi,
>
>> Hauke,
>>
>> My idea for naming schema was to use:
>> bcma_host_TYPE_*
>>
>> Like:
>> bcma_host_pci_*
>> bcma_host_sdio_*
>>
>> You are using:
>> bcma_host_bcma_*
>>
>> What do you think about changing this to:
>> bcma_host_embedded_*
>> or just some:
>> bcma_host_emb_*
>> ?
>>
>> Does it make more sense to you? I was trying to keep names in bcma
>> really clear, so every first-time-reader can see differences between
>> hosts, host and driver, etc.
>
> how about bcma_host_soc ?

We get then inconsistency with "BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED". I'd like to
1) See something like bcma_host_emb...
xor
2) Use bcma_host_soc_* and BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC

-- 
Rafał

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>